It is a good rule of thumb for businesses to always expect their actions to be reported on page one, above the fold, of the local newspaper. If you are fine with that, then go ahead with the action. If not, well that is something to think about.
A recent lawsuit alleges Sharp Grossmont Hospital in San Diego used hidden cameras to secretly record procedure room contacts with 1,800 patients at a women’s health center in El Cajon, California, including hysterectomies, sterilizations and caesarean births. The cameras also allegedly recorded women undressing. Lincoln et al., v. Sharp Healthcare, Sup. Ct., San Diego, CA.
How could this happen? Well, a legitimate underlying concern existed for the hospital. A listed anesthesia drug, propofol, repeatedly was being stolen from medication carts. This is a serious problem indeed. The solution? The hospital allegedly installed motion-activated cameras as part of an investigation into whether an employee was stealing the anesthesia drug from drug carts in the operating rooms. Continue reading →
On October 16, 2017, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruled favorably on a Personal Representative’s access to a deceased user’s online accounts and digital property (Ajeman v. Yahoo). This is the first reported case with respect to access to digital assets by a fiduciary.
The conundrum: Email are part of a deceased user’s estate. But a personal representative (aka executor) can’t read them without violating Federal privacy or anti-hacking law. The Ajeman case is the first to permit access and will empower fiduciaries throughout the U.S.
Hurricanes are a fact of life in South Florida, and they don’t stop just because you are under contract to buy your home. As Hurricane Irma threatens all of Florida and the Caribbean, there are thousands of home buyers stuck waiting and wondering what is going to happen with their purchase.
I am often asked what people need to know and what they need to do if they are under contract to buy a home, condo, or townhouse. Here’s the general items to be aware of.
1. Your contract allows for this.
First and foremost, don’t panic – your contract to purchase allows and even makes accommodations for this very scenario (so long as you used the standard contracts). You should have a closing delay clause in your contract that allows you to close on the transaction up to a “reasonable” amount of time after a hurricane has dissipated – “reasonable” is generally considered to be about seven days.
If you’re unsure what your delay clause allows for, ask your Realtor or attorney to review your contract and walk you through it. Continue reading →
Florida Courts have historically protected a parent’s right to practice their religious beliefs with their children no matter how unconventional and regardless of the other parent’s objection. In the matter of Koch v. Koch, 41 Fla. L. Weekly (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), the trial court was AFFIRMED for prohibiting the father from discussing “ANY religious matters during visitation with his children.”
The constitutional limitation to protect a parent’s right to expose their children to their religious beliefs was clearly established in Rogers v. Rogers, 490 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) where the Appellate Court concluded: “In family law proceedings, a court may not restrict a post-dissolution parent’s religious beliefs, no matter how unconventional.”
In 2014, the First District provided some level of protection for children if the exposure to the parent’s religion was harmful by concluding “restrictions upon a noncustodial parent’s right to expose his or her child to his or her religious beliefs have consistently been overturned in the absence of clear, affirmative showing that the religious activities at issue will be harmful to the child.” Pierson v, Pierson, 143 So.3d 1201 (Fla 1st DCA 2014).
When you spawn with another you will be tied to them forever.
This gets complicated when the relationship between the parents fails.
The State of Florida protects parents and their relationships. In fact, Florida Law provides:
It is the public policy of this state that each minor child has frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the parents separate or the marriage of the parties is dissolved and to encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities, and joys, of childrearing.
Establishing parental responsibility over the children is a major issue in the dissolution of a marriage. Parental responsibility includes who gets to make decisions over a child’s life, such as what school the child(ren) should attend or what medical treatment(s) are appropriate.
Decision-making authority can be granted to one parent if the decision making of the other parent has proven to be detrimental to the child(ren).
This does not mean one parent is granted sole custody if the other parent is seemingly not as good a parent or has a substance abuse issue or has a volatile temper. Continue reading →